The Supreme Court Made the Vote Smaller. Now We Make the Election Bigger.

Get My Book

Today’s Supreme Court decision is not just about Louisiana. It is about whether America still believes the vote is a real instrument of citizenship, or just a ritual we perform after power has already been distributed.

In Louisiana v. Callais , the Court struck down Louisiana’s second majority-Black congressional district in a 6–3 decision, calling it an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. That sounds clean if you say it fast. But the practical effect is dirty: Black voters in a state where they make up roughly one-third of the population may now have less power to elect representatives of their choice.

The Court did not technically erase Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. It did something more familiar in American law. It left the body standing and removed the organs.

This is how civil rights are diminished in the modern era. Not always with a dramatic repeal. Not always with a sheriff at the courthouse door. Sometimes it comes dressed as constitutional neutrality. Sometimes it comes with a clean phrase like “race-based decision-making,” while ignoring the racial structure that made the remedy necessary in the first place.

The Voting Rights Act was passed because states had mastered the art of making exclusion look legal. Poll taxes, literacy tests, district lines, timing rules, registration tricks — all of it had the same purpose: keep power where it already was. Section 2 mattered because it said the law should look at results, not just excuses. If a map diluted minority voting power, the law could intervene even if the state claimed clean hands.