≥
Loading Inclusionism
Loading Inclusionism
Comparer les cadres
Inclusionism ne cherche pas à gagner en prouvant que toute autre philosophie a tort.
Il peut être à gauche du progressisme moralement, mais il est présenté comme un cadre civilisationnel plus large.
Politique
Économique
Civilisationnel
Technologique
Dynamique centrale
Political
Democracy asks who decides; Inclusionism also asks whose interaction creates value and how that value becomes legitimate.
Political
Liberalism protects the individual from coercion; Inclusionism studies whether agents can participate in value creation and recognition.
Political
Conservatism asks what must be preserved; Inclusionism asks what systems preserve agency, value, fairness, and belonging.
Political
Socialism centers control of production; Inclusionism centers recognition and legitimate distribution of emergent value.
Political
Democratic socialism is a political-economic project; Inclusionism is a civilizational framework for recognition and legitimacy.
Political
Communism seeks class abolition; Inclusionism seeks legitimate recognition of value across differentiated agents.
Political
Fascism manufactures belonging through exclusion; Inclusionism seeks belonging through legitimate recognition of differentiated agents.
Political
Technocracy asks what works; Inclusionism asks for whom, recognized by whom, owned by whom, and legitimated how.
Political
Anarchism resists hierarchy; Inclusionism evaluates which structures legitimate agency and belonging at scale.
Political
Progressivism pushes reform; Inclusionism explains why recognition, agency, and belonging are civilizational requirements.
Economic
Capitalism rewards ownership of capital; Inclusionism asks whether ownership tracks actual value contribution and agency.
Economic
Feudalism ties value and belonging to hierarchy; Inclusionism ties legitimacy to recognized interaction and agency.
Economic
Mercantilism optimizes state wealth; Inclusionism tests whether wealth is legitimately generated and distributed.
Political
Socialism centers control of production; Inclusionism centers recognition and legitimate distribution of emergent value.
Economic
Market socialism democratizes firms; Inclusionism broadens ownership participation across all value-generating interaction.
Economic
Stakeholder capitalism broadens concern; Inclusionism demands legitimate attribution, agency, and ownership structures.
Economic
UBI distributes income; Inclusionism asks who owns and legitimates the value-producing systems.
Economic
UBO is one institutional expression of Inclusionism's value-recognition-ownership logic.
Future-Oriented
Transhumanism asks how humans can be enhanced; Inclusionism asks who owns, governs, and belongs in enhancement systems.
Future-Oriented
Posthumanism critiques human centrality; Inclusionism builds recognition systems for differentiated agents.
Future-Oriented
EA optimizes impact; Inclusionism asks whether value and agency are recognized legitimately by affected agents.
Future-Oriented
Longtermism extends moral time horizons; Inclusionism connects future value to legitimate recognition across agents now and later.
Future-Oriented
Accelerationism asks how fast capability can grow; Inclusionism asks who is recognized, empowered, protected, and included.
Future-Oriented
Successionism imagines replacement; Inclusionism asks how differentiated intelligences can share legitimate civilization.